We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Smell-O-Vision?

Michael Pollick
By
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
EasyTechJunkie is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At EasyTechJunkie, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

During the 1950s and early 1960s, motion picture companies experimented with a number of gimmicks in order to compete with the new audience-stealing medium known as television. One of these gimmicks, championed by movie producer Mike Todd, Jr., was dubbed Smell-O-Vision because it attempted to use familiar scents to enhance an audience's movie-going experience. The Smell-O-Vision process proved to be a glitch-filled flop with audiences, however, and only one Smell-O-Vision movie was ever shown in theaters.

The process Todd called Smell-O-Vision was actually developed by a German movie technician named Hans Laube several decades earlier. Laube called his system Scentovision, however. The basic concept involved a projectionist manually releasing various scent vials at specific points in a movie, such as the scent of flowers during a romantic scene or the smell of gun smoke during a shoot-out. The original Scentovision system failed to catch on for a number of reasons, not the least of which was the substantial amount of conflicting fragrances which eventually filled the theater.

When Mike Todd, Jr. and his father were considering a novel approach to promoting their newest film, Around the World in 80 Days, they recalled an earlier demonstration of Laube's Scentovision system. Although the redubbed Smell-O-Vision system was not actually implemented on that film, Todd did commission a comedy-mystery film which would feature Smell-O-Vision. This movie was appropriately titled Scent of Mystery, and it would hold the dubious honor of being the first and last movie produced in Smell-O-Vision.

The idea was to rig individual theater seats with hollow tubes which would transmit the various scents at crucial plot points. One character would be represented by a distinctive scent of pipe smoke, for example. A belt containing the individual fragrance vials would be synchronized with the soundtrack in order to ensure audience member received the right scent at precisely the right moment. In practice, however, some of the scents did not sync up well with the plot points, arriving too late or not at all.

Smell-O-Vision suffered from the same problem 3-D movies did several years earlier. The process itself was much better than the movies which employed it. Audiences became frustrated with the sensory overload aspect of Smell-O-Vision, and Scent of Mystery was universally panned by movie critics at the time. The era of motion picture gimmicks soon ended, and the Smell-O-Vision process was mothballed as studios struggled to survive.

Modern attempts at reviving Smell-O-Vision usually involve special scratch-and-sniff cards which audiences are asked to smell during specific scenes. While this may have solved some of the technical glitches regarding the transmission of scents, directors such as John Waters have demonstrated some dubious choices when it comes to the fragrances included in a modern Smell-O-Vision movie.

EasyTechJunkie is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Pollick
By Michael Pollick , Writer
As a frequent contributor to EasyTechJunkie, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range of topics. His curiosity drives him to study subjects in-depth, resulting in informative and engaging articles. Prior to becoming a professional writer, Michael honed his skills as an English tutor, poet, voice-over artist, and DJ.

Discussion Comments

By Inaventu — On Aug 13, 2014

I actually found one of those John Waters Smell-O-Vision cards at a vintage and antique store. Most of the scents had worn off, but I could still smell a few. They were awful. I bought the card mostly for the novelty of it. I grew up when John Waters' movies were the big underground rage.

I can see why 3D movies might be interesting to watch. They do bring some depth to the scenes. But those other gimmicks like Smell-O-Vision and electrified seats were just silly.

By Buster29 — On Aug 12, 2014

I don't think I would have enjoyed watching a movie in Smell-O-Vision. I get a headache when a co-workers wears too much perfume to work, so sitting in a crowded movie theater while someone pumped all sorts of odors into the air would be too much. The scratch-and-sniff card idea might be better, but I'm not sure I really need to smell gunpowder or burning gasoline or perfume to get the idea of a scene.

Michael Pollick

Michael Pollick

Writer

As a frequent contributor to EasyTechJunkie, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide...
Learn more
EasyTechJunkie, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

EasyTechJunkie, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.