Internet
Fact-checked

At EasyTechJunkie, we're committed to delivering accurate, trustworthy information. Our expert-authored content is rigorously fact-checked and sourced from credible authorities. Discover how we uphold the highest standards in providing you with reliable knowledge.

Learn more...

What is Moore's Law?

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov

Moore's Law, initially formulated by Gordon Moore, then Chairman of Intel, first appeared in a 1965 article in the 35th anniversary edition of Electronics, "Cramming more components onto integrated circuits." It asserts that the complexity of minimum-cost semiconductor components has doubled regularly each year since the first prototype microchip was introduced in 1959.

Throughout the 80s and 90s, Moore's Law began to be rephrased by others in terms of the number of transistors that fit on a chip of fixed size, or the computational power per unit cost. This remarkable law has held strong at least up to the writing of this article, in 2005. In addition, a number of Moore's-variants of exponential growth have appeared in the development of LED lights, resolution of brain scanning devices, mass use of inventions, number of genomes sequenced, availability of RAM, size of magnetic data storage, and fastest possible data transmission speed.

A central processing unit.
A central processing unit.

What makes the success of Moore's Law all the more fascinating is that Moore only had 6 years experience with microchips as a basis for his assertion, but nonetheless it has held for 40 additional years. The death of the law has been predicted multiple times, but it has kept chugging on. Industry experts expect a hiccup in it around 2015, when conventional photolithographical techniques will reach their final limits.

Photolithography uses light beams to etch features into a chip, meaning that etching smaller features requires smaller wavelengths of light. Photolithography is already edging into the ultraviolet range. Going much further than that is difficult because of the large energies required to produce smaller-frequency waves. Therefore, other alternatives, such as DNA computing, nanocomputing, 3-D chips, or something unprecedented, will have to be used to ensure the exponential growth of computing power.

Economy, in at least one area, has had to give in order to sustain the continued exponential growth of Moore's Law. That area is the initial capital required to make a modern microchip-manufacturing plant, currently on the order of $1.5 - $2 billion (US dollars). Research and development costs to push Moore's Law past photolithography are likely to be on the same order of cost, if not several times larger. But as the demand increases for computing power used for a variety of applications, it is very likely that the necessary supply will be created to meet that demand.

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime EasyTechJunkie contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. In addition to being an avid blogger, Michael is particularly passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. He has also worked for the Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation.

Learn more...
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime EasyTechJunkie contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. In addition to being an avid blogger, Michael is particularly passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. He has also worked for the Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation.

Learn more...

Discussion Comments

hanley79

@ aishia - Wouldn't it be interesting if somebody examined how fast technology advanced on average before Moore's Law was declared and found that it doubled in complexity at the same rate? I wonder if it still counts as Moore's Law to be talking about the complexity of technology in general, even if it's not a computer microchip.

aishia

The article talks about technology advancing because of Moore's Law, but I think it's the opposite. Isn't Moore's Law's consistency just a byproduct of technology advancing at the speed it's advancing? It's kind of weird that technology consistently keeps getting exactly twice as complex as before, though -- I guess that's the fastest we can advance, at least for now.

malmal

Wow, I had never heard of Moore's Law until I found it here on WiseGEEK! The article says that industry experts expect a hiccup in Moore's Law in 2015, but haven't these same experts also been predicting that Moore's Law would die for 40 years or so?

I don't think it will hiccup at all; with nanotechnology getting as fancy as it's getting, someday we'll probably have a circuit board with the components as small as cells. Technology has already been moving so fast thanks to Moore's Law that it's able to do amazing things -- can you even imagine what our technology will be able to do in the future?

Post your comments
Login:
Forgot password?
Register:
    • A central processing unit.
      By: Restyler
      A central processing unit.